Vendor application
Vendors submit a company application through the public Portal Access page, including role, target tracks, territories, and capability summary.
Vendor Process
A clear path from first application to secure portal access.
UAH uses a staged vendor workflow: application, review, information release where appropriate, bank-transfer payment, manual verification, issued portal credentials, and submission inside the secure workspace.
Application model
Public first step
Payment handling
Manual verification
Portal issuance
One login per company
Process map
Built to protect the program while keeping qualified vendors moving.
Review and qualification
The UAH team reviews strategic fit, delivery capability, and track relevance before moving a company into the next stage.
General information release
Qualified applicants may receive a first layer of general information before any payment instruction or protected tender package is issued.
Bank transfer and verification
Where applicable, the next step is payment by bank transfer. Bank details are shared privately after review, not published on the site.
Portal credentials issued
After payment verification, one portal login is issued per company, aligned to approved vendor role and one or more modality tracks.
Assigned documents and submission workspace
Inside the Vendor Portal, companies receive only the protected documents relevant to their approved tracks and complete the tender package online.
What is public
- Stage I scope covers Radiology, Radiotherapy, and Cardiac pathways across a 37-country footprint.
- The program follows a five-year delivery horizon with track-specific workstreams and phased expansion.
- Indicative windows and acquisition models are shared at a summary level, while detailed templates and evaluation mechanics remain protected.
- Detailed tender files are released only through the vendor qualification and portal process.
What remains protected
- Bid security and performance bond details.
- Attachment forms and detailed tender templates.
- Exact evaluation criteria and weighting logic.
- Track-specific tender files released only to approved vendors after review and verification.
Indicative windows
Indicative timing is shared at program level.
Indicative public window for RT category procurement and partner engagement.
Indicative public window for radiology category procurement and submissions.
Indicative public window for cardiac intervention packages.
Commercial framing
Accepted public payment and acquisition models
These structures help vendors understand the commercial frameworks referenced across the program before entering the protected workflow.
Revenue sharing / pay-per-use
Commercial structures can align vendor participation with service utilization and measured delivery output.
MSA / fee-for-service
Managed service and operational support models remain relevant where service continuity is critical.
Subscription equipment-as-a-service
Recurring commercial structures support phased deployment and lifecycle management across a large footprint.
Finance lease / hire purchase
Long-term capital models may be applied in structured rollouts where ownership timing matters.
Lease agreement
Flexible leasing remains suitable for certain equipment classes and regional rollout conditions.
Deferred payment / installment
Deferred structures support phased implementation where aligned with contracting terms.
Ready to Proceed